STRESS
Stress is a suprasegmental feature of utterances. It applies not to  individual vowels and consonants but to whole syllable – whatever they  might be. A stressed syllable is pronounced with a greater amount of  energy than an unstressed syllable and is more primainent in the flow of  speech. 
English and other Germanic languages make far more use of differences in  stress than do most of the languages of the world. In many languages,  the position of the stress is fixed iin relation to the word. Czech  words nearly always have the stress on the first syllable, irrespective  of the number of syllables in the word. In polish and Swahili, the  stress is usually on the penultimate syllable. 
Variation in the use of stress cause different languages to have  different rhythms, but stress is only one factor in causing rhythmic  differences. Because it can appear to be a major factor , it used to be  said that some languages (such as french) could be called syllable –  timed languages, in which syllables tned to recur at regular intervals  of time. In contrast, English and pother Germanic languages were called  stress – timed in that stressese were said to be dominating feature of  the rhythmic timing. We now know that is not true. In contemporary  French there are aften strong stresses breaking the rhythm of a  sentence. In English the rhythm of a sentence depends on several  interecting factors, not just the stress. Perhaps a better way  describing stress deffer ences among languages would be to divide  languages into those that have variable word stress (such as English and  Germanic ) those that have fixed word stress (such as Czech , Polish ,  and Swahili ), and those that have fixed phrase stress (such as Frenc   ). 
In contrast to the nature of syllable , the nature of stress is fairly  well understood. Stressed sounds are those on the speaker expends more  muscular energy. This usually involves pushing out more air from the  lungs by contracting the muscles of the rib cage, and perhaps increasing  the pitch by the use of the laryngeal mucles. The extra activity may  result in giving the sound greater length. There may also be increases  in the muscular activity involved in the articulary movements. 
When there is an increase in the amount of air being pushed out of the  lungs, there is increase in the loudness of the sound produced. Some  books define stress simply in terms of loudness, but this is not a very  useful definition if loudness considered to be simply a metter of te  amount of acoustic energy involved. We have already noted that some  sounds have more acoustic energy than others because of factors such as  the degree of mount opening. 
A much more important indication of stress iin the rise in pitch, which  may or may not be due to laryngeal action. You can check for your self  that an increase in the flow of air out of the lungs causes a rise in  pitch even without an increase in the activity of the laryngeal muscles.  Ask a friend to press against the lower part of your chest while you  stand against a wall with your eyes shut. Now say a ong vowel on a  steady ptch and have your friend push against your chest at an  unexpected moment. You will find that at the same time as there is an  increase in the flow of air out of your lungs (as a result of your  friend’s push), there will also be an increase in the pitch f the vowel.  
There is final factor to note when discussing stress in English. We saw  in charpter 5 that a syllable in English is either stressed or not  stressed. If it is stressed it can be at the center of an intonational  ptch change so that it receives a tonic accent, which might be said to  raise it to a more primary level of stress. If it is unstressed it can  have a full vowel or a reduced vowel. In some views, a reduced vowel  implies that there is a lower level of stress, but in the view expressed  here this is not a metter of stress but of vowel quality. We also saw  that there are pairs of words, such as ‘(an) insult’ and (to) insult  that differ only in stress. What happens when these words appear to lose  their stress because of a heavy stress elsewhere in the sentence ?  consider a pair of sentences such as ‘he need an increase in price’ and,  with an equally strong stress on ‘needed’, ‘he needed to increase the  price’. The answer in that the stress difference between the two words  is not completely lost. There may be no changes in pitch associated with  the difference in stress, but there are still differences in the  relative lengths of the syllables. A stressed syllable is pronounced  with a greater amount of energy than an unstressed syllable, and this  difference may be manifested simply in the length of the syllable.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar